9 results for 'cat:"Copyright" AND cat:"Injunction"'.
J. King grants the pet products company an injunction regarding its complaint that the store is manufacturing and selling products, including a pet hair remover, that infringe on the pet products company's patent. The pet products company shows that the store infringed on its copyright, and evidence shows that an injunction serves in the public interest as opposed to harming the public interest.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: King, Filed On: March 31, 2024, Case #: 2:20cv1768, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: copyright, Patent, injunction
J. Immergut partially grants the software company's motion for a preliminary injunction in its lawsuit asserting that the domain holders sold unauthorized licenses for the software company's hosting automation management software online. An asset freeze is issued against the domain holders for all assets related to infringing domains because they took multiple steps to hide their identities and avoid the software company's scrutiny. However, the software company's motion to freeze all assets is not justifiable as it is indiscriminate and lacks knowledge.
Court: USDC Oregon, Judge: Immergut, Filed On: January 3, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv1963, NOS: Copyrights - Property Rights, Categories: copyright, injunction
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Fischer finds the trial court properly denied the medical marijuana dispensary's motion for a preliminary injunction in this trademark infringement action. The medical marijuana processor, which sells pre-rolled joints to dispensaries, markets products under a different spelling of the same copyrighted name as a product marketed by the dispensary. The companies had been selling their products in the same market for more than a year before the suit was filed and there is no need for a preliminary injunction to preserve the status quo until there is a final determination made. Affirmed.
Court: Oklahoma Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Fischer , Filed On: December 6, 2023, Case #: 119859, Categories: copyright, injunction
J. Dever orders an injunction be placed on a person who, in conjunction with multiple other individuals and companies, allegedly used copyright-infringing software or machines in violation of state and federal laws. It is deemed proper that an injunction be used in this case, and this person has consented to it, stipulating that he no longer use, distribute or duplicate any intellectual property belonging to the two marketing and auctioneering firms that initially brought the claims.
Court: USDC Eastern District of North Carolina, Judge: Dever, Filed On: November 14, 2023, Case #: 5:23cv136, NOS: Copyrights - Property Rights, Categories: copyright, Trademark, injunction
J. Chun grants default judgement to the Texas corporation for its claim that the Chinese corporation unlawfully copied 19 of the former's original photographs and used them to market its products on Amazon. A reasonable consumer would likely confuse the Chinese corporation's copies with the Texas corporation's products because the images and titles that the Chinese corporation used in its Amazon listings are identical to the Texas corporation's photographs and marks. The Texas corporation is entitled to an injunction and $47,900 in costs.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Chun, Filed On: June 27, 2023, Case #: 2:22cv1413, NOS: Copyrights - Property Rights, Categories: copyright, Damages, injunction